Gail Kim Willing To Stay With TNA, Samoa Joe and Booker T Interviews

- Other sites have made the note so I’ll reiterate, Gail Kim is more than willing to stay with TNA if they give her an offer that isn’t insulting. WWE have made her a very good deal and if TNA don’t match it or at least make an effort to keep her then she’s going to sign the WWE contract. As I reported a few days ago, despite being the consistently highest rated segments on the show, the women are paid far less than the men. The only way Kim will return to TNA is if they reach out to her and make it right.

- Josh Stewart at the Long Island Press recently interviewed Samoa Joe at this Link.

Joe mentions that “I’m already on that [WWE-type] schedule. Guys like myself, A.J. Styles, Black Machismo, it goes up and down the line. A lot of us are already fulfilling that schedule. For some of the company, it is an easier schedule. They’ve worked hard throughout the years, and believe me, if anybody feels they deserve some time off it’s me. But I know that right now TNA is running full-steam.”

He continued to discuss the Scott Hall incident. “I don’t apologize for anything I said out there. What I said is what I said. What I do apologize for is the people it was taken out on. Kevin [Nash] is good friend of mine, and a really great person, and a man who’s done wonders in this business.”

- In a recent interview with Live Audio Wrestling, Booker T agreed that TNA has too many gimmick matches and is often confusing, stating that it isn’t his deal and he’d prefer a more traditional product. He also said that he tends to disagree with Vince Russo’s creative decisions.

2 Responses to “ Gail Kim Willing To Stay With TNA, Samoa Joe and Booker T Interviews ”

  1. Hey TNA even your top talent don’t get what’s going on in the company. Sounds like another company from the ninties I know about, now what was its name……

  2. I hope she does stay with TNA!!!

Leave a Reply

To keep the integrity of the site all comments on wrestling news articles are pre-approved before being published (However they do not represent our editorial opinion). For a comment to be approved it must be a well thought out point and not a simple one word remark.