Comments on: Does TNA Consider TNA Competition? Edge Interview, Brian Lawler Update

By: chimi213

chimi213 — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 04:00:38 +0000

To Jerry Watson I agree in regards to HHH.

Edge vs Christian would be great…if it was a ladder match at Wrestlemania. Anything else would be just be another mediocre match. Anyone who watched TNA can clearly see the decline of Christian Cage’s performance. (By the way C.C missed almost everyone of his important moves during the Money in the Bank match.)All Christian has now is a sorry set of moves and a catchy theme song.

PS: HHH’s pedigree is a joke, i dont think he’s even trying anymore. (I hav respect 4 HHH because of his hardcore street fights back in the day with ppl like Mick Foley)

By: Eric Bird

Eric Bird — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:45:59 +0000

Reply to James Wright : Edge has been in the WWE for 13 years. He debuted in 1996 if im not wrong.

But Edge & Christian again would be, sort of entertaining.

By: Jerry Watson

Jerry Watson — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:28:53 +0000

TNA is much better than WWE because Vince Mcmahon sucks and is always around. Triple H is his his son in law and that’s why he keeps on winning. Favortism, Stephanie is hot though. If Eric B had of took over WCW WWE would have been in trouble. TNA is doing what WCW would have done because of better wrestlers. I hope they never sell, because I can’t stomach Triple H nor Vince Mcmahon much longer.

By: kenny

kenny — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:19:20 +0000

that’s why TNA is better, cause they are “Pro Wrestling” and not entertainment

By: James Wright

James Wright — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:31:25 +0000

I would say Edge is in Undertaker’s league when he was ‘Big Evil’ because that is where his problems with fans cheering him started. So he is in the Undertaker 2001-2003 league. But that was when Undertaker had only been in the company just over ten years, same as Edge now I think.

So short answer is; Yes, they are on a par with each other in my opinion. When Edge has been in the company close to 20 years then he will be where the Undertaker is now.

By: Daysinthewake

Daysinthewake — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:20:23 +0000

See, what I think would be an amazing idea would be:

Matt Hardy & Edge

Vs.

Jeff Hardy & Christian.

Think about it people, it would be awesome. Just think of the angles, the storylines and the matches you could have!!

By: carl keane

carl keane — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:41:55 +0000

They cant have vince so drastically announce that pro wrestling is nothing but sports ENTERTAINMENT and now say in thier own favour that the two are different things.

Besides I would consider TNA to be much more entertaining than WWE

By: chris

chris — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:19:08 +0000

wwe vs tna ould be good.

By: DorkStar

DorkStar — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:47:31 +0000

I think Edge was just trying to be humble. He’s had more title time than both Undertaker and Michaels combined it seems. Of course, titles mean nothing now but he has Rick Flair numbers. I’m not saying he’s better than them but he’s in their league for sure. The interview odviously wasn’t in character. Edge “the character” would say he’s better then both of them. In a shoot interview however, nobody in their right mind would say that.
Speaking of not being your right mind. The iron Sheik would not only say he’s better then them. He would threaten to Sodomize them

By: Casey Hill

Casey Hill — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:31:22 +0000

That would be cool , e & c reunion, 2 bad it likly wont happen