Comments on: Column: Multiple Title Reigns are Overrated

By: James Wright

James Wright — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:04:40 +0000

I agree with you completely about WWE and World title reigns. I would like to see more title changes in the intercontinental and US title divisions. Or should I say more changes after a long feud rather than someone keeping the belt without defending it for weeks and then just suddenly losing it for no apparent reason or backstage politics.

It seems like titles don’t mean anything anymore.

By: E. Schneider

E. Schneider — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:19:10 +0000

I agree, the whole multiple title reigns is getting, no wait, has gotten old. They need more reigns like, and I hate to say this cause I don’t like him, JBL’s title reign. Win, Lose, Draw, Hook, or Crook the title reigns should be longer. Also I am sure the guy who does the name plates is fed up as well. And also, let SOMEBODY NEW win the title. I am so tired of seeing the same five or so guys winning it. Build up a new guy, I mean they bust their asses to get to where they are and then 9.9 out of 10 times are snuffed out b/c of wrestling politics. To name a name, Triple H is the most notorious for doing this. He’s done it several times to Kane, Big Show, and Others. All b/c he’s married to the bosses daughter and can basically do whatever he damn well pleases and it’s BS. Well I apologize for rambling, but the multiple reigns have to end. F.Y.I Jerry Lawler was a
26 time USWA Champ. Thanks

By: Hank

Hank — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 03:41:28 +0000

Hey I dont mind Triple H and agree that he is skilled both in the ring and mic. However I belive if he was not married to Stephanie he would not be champion as many times as he has been. I choose not to name him beacuse in my opinion he is the most guilty of causing the short title runs.

By: dark magician

dark magician — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:15:21 +0000

well you are right joe

please don’t say bad for hhh he has good talent in boith wrestling and on mic

By: Joe

Joe — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:57:44 +0000

I hate how people diss HHH just because he is Vinces son in Law….. he works damn hard. He has had muscles ripped off his legs TWICE and yet still goes out to give us a damn good show.

Or….maybe hes doing it because he actually likes pretending hes a king….. nar didnt think so.

I like quick reigns because its makes the shows more exciting. Please dont diss HHH, Because ill bite right back.

By: Mad Dog

Mad Dog — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:15:57 +0000

Look at “Superstar” Billy Graham he had a ten month long reign and he was a great champion. But nowadays only John Cena and Triple H are aloud those long title reigns.

By: pricey

pricey — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 04:40:58 +0000

I totally agree, its really fucking annoying seeing the belt change so many times…i’d be happy if a edge had only 1 title reign that lasted at least 6 months or so…the need to go back to the days where reigns lasted over a long period of time like shawn micheals in 96 or any of hitmanslong reigns!!!…P.S hope Cena doesn’t win belt at mania and Orton beats HHH